RFD 1106: The open/proprietary boundary, in public words

Problem

The client source is open. A fork could read that as an invitation to run as “Weftspun,” or reuse the hosted AI and registry backends. Nothing public states where the open license ends and the proprietary service begins.

Decision

Publish one page stating the split, with no pricing, revenue target, or investor detail in it. The client (LICENSE) is open, self-hostable under a different product name. Three areas stay proprietary, not granted by the OSS license: the trademark, the hosted 3DAIGC-API with its model tuning and quality gates, and the marketplace/personalization services built on it.

See DETAILS.md for the architecture split diagram and the per-area table.

Details

The measurements and the retractions